The Ethics Of Human Enhancement

The British Academy have just released a report on Human Enhancement and The Future of Work headlined by the BBC as “Concern over ‘Souped up’ human race”.

A race of humans who can work without tiring and recall every conversation they’ve ever had may sound like science fiction, but experts say the research field of human enhancement is moving so fast that such concepts are a tangible reality that we must prepare for.

The reason for the concern?  The combined academic panel (from the Academy of Medical Science, the British Academy, the Royal Academy of Engineering and the Royal Society) are focusing on cognition-enhancing drugs as an immediate and pressing issue for us all. Whilst the report talks about the workplace, performance enhancers are already becoming common place on university campuses.

Obviously, Humans have been using chemical stimulants to enhance performance for thousands of years. Like millions of others I need a good jolt of decent tasting caffeine to get me going in the morning. However, the recent rise in the non-prescribed use of substances like Ritalin as a study aid up’s the ante considerably – and it’s just the start.

In many ways, popping a pill is more insidious than the more scifi-esque possibilities of mechanical human augmentation (such as bio-implanted screens) as the effects are internal and hard to immediately detect. However they do show up very clearly on an MRI scan. Caffeine accentuates activity in specific areas of the brain. However, drugs like Ritalin not only turn up certain brain activity, they also turn off brain activity elsewhere.

Consumption creates the ability to focus, non-stop and without distraction, for roughly four hours per pill – and therefore do better by, for example, gaining a better grade. Naturally, if an equally capable fellow student is suddenly attaining better grades through taking a performance enhancer, it becomes mightily tempting for classmates to follow them.

 A Cambridge University Professor of Psychology reported this week that 10% of students now admit to taking cognitive enhancing drugs (implying the actual number is higher) and has called for Universities to discourage use by screening students.

This draws comparison with another professional activity.  Sports people are routinely screened for use of performance enhancing substances. As has been highlighted by the latest Lance Armstrong revelations, and this summers Pistorius Para-Olympic controversy, sports governing bodies perceive performance enhancing technology as creating an unfair advantage i.e. cheating. Abusers are banned from the sport, often for life.

As a society this creates a contradiction.  Should physical performance enhancing drugs be banned for professional athletes but cognitive performance enhancers for our “cerebral muscle” be OK for trainee and qualified professionals? Is it OK for doctors, judges, bankers and teachers to use them?  How about the police or air traffic control? 

As with professional athletes there’s also a danger that, for those who can obtain them, establishing early habitual and often addictive use of performance enhancing drugs may become a learned and entrenched behavior across a career: “Have a big report due in the morning? Take a legal amphetamine”.  

Unlike unprofessional athletes, there are likely to be unknown long-term effects of cognitive enhancers which also need to be considered. The FDA drug approval mechanism measures benefits and side-effects over years, not decades. We have no way of knowing what happens to our long term brain chemistry if psychotropic drugs have been taken habitually for extended periods of time, starting when the brain is still developing. It might be OK, it might not. We simply don’t know.

Cognitive enhancement research will grow rapidly in the coming decade as pharmaceutical companies follow the money by developing more sophisticated and specifically targeted drugs. It’s also something that will eventually impact all of us.

A simple example: what should I do in a few years time when my kids demand Ritalin (or something similar) to help them keep up with their classmates at school?  What would you do?

The report, Human Enhancement and the Future of Work, can be downloaded here.

7 thoughts on “The Ethics Of Human Enhancement

  1. Thank you. Great report and point of view! In 2001 I met at one educational Conference John Breeding Ph.D., who sent me next year his book titled: TRUE NATURE AND GREAT MISUNDERSTANDINGS. How we care for our children according to our Understanding. John is an American psychiatrist, one of may who protests to give children Ritalin because of its side-effect…and reverse effect. Ritalin is used very frequently for children with ADHD (7 milions of children are on Ritalin there!!!). It is toning drug…and after give back all the anger, reactivity multiplied

  2. Hi Ewa, thanks for the comment and suggestion, I’ll look up John Breeding. I agree, the possibilities for human development in education are amazing. For example, we’re at the threshold of universal access to education worldwide (via smartphones apps etc) and a far deeper understanding of the ways in which our brains absorb and utilize new information. However, the ability for a select few to purchase non-prescribed cognitive-enhancing pills as a quick and effortless performance aid is very concerning. Let alone the fact that, as you mention, this class of drugs are in themselves very controversial in their intended use (treating symptoms of ADHD). It’s entirely probable and understandable that Pharma companies will seek to develop more sophisticated and better targeted cognitive-enhancing pills over the next few years. It’s therefore an area that could really do with pro-active and intelligent regulation, hopefully without the regulators needing to pop a pill! :)

    • Hello Bob,
      I found the web of Dr John Breeding. It is http://www.wildestcolts.com and his email there john@wildestcolts.com. John is absolutely devoted to his work. Check the interview with him on this web: July 25, 2009 – Bryant McGill and Susaye Green hold an extended, commercial-free conversation with John. This amazing interview challenges ideas of normalcy, psychiatry, mental health and the pharmaceutical industry itself..
      I will send you soon some of my writings. I am writing a lot, but most in Polish language

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s